Our thinking

Things to consider.

What we've concluded from doing this work, and the reasoning behind it. New pieces are cross-posted to LinkedIn. Follow along there, or subscribe by RSS.

What we believe

Four things we keep coming back to.

Simplification beats accumulation

There are over 5,000 security products on the market and the answer is almost never another one. Fewer, better-integrated controls that your people actually operate will out-perform a larger stack nobody has time to tune.

AI is a defender's problem and a defender's tool

Your organization is already running AI, whether or not anyone approved it. Governing that is urgent. So is using it. Defenders who wait for the perfect model will spend the next two years being out-paced by attackers who didn't.

Fear-based selling is a failure of explanation

If a security investment can only be justified by describing a catastrophe, the case hasn't been made. Risk framed in financial, operational and reputational terms lets a board decide like adults.

The measure of advisory work is what you can do after we leave

A two-hundred-page assessment only its author can interpret creates dependency, not capability. Good work transfers judgement, not just deliverables.

Colleagues working through a position in a client session

Articles

In depth.

Let's talk

Reading is good. Doing is better.

If one of these hit close to home, that's usually a sign it's worth a conversation.